Newschevron_rightCase highlight - Apple State aid case


Case highlight - Apple State aid case

11 september 2024
Studentcorner Case highlight

๐๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ง๐ž๐ฐ๐ฌ๐Ÿšจ ๐„๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž๐š๐ง ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐š๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž ๐†๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐€๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž ๐’๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐š๐ข๐ ๐œ๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐š๐ง๐ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐„๐” ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐ˆ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐ญ๐จ โ‚ฌ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‘ ๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐€๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž.

This is todayโ€™s second (important) victory for the EU Commission, together with the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Google Shopping case (see our LinkedIn post).

In ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”, the EU Commission found that Ireland had granted unlawful and incompatible State aid to two companies belonging to the Apple Group, through tax rulings concerning the internal allocation of profits within Apple. The Commission ordered Ireland to recover the aid, comprising tax benefits worth up to โ‚ฌ13 billion.

In ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ, the General Court confirmed that the EU Commission can, in principle, review tax rulings under State aid rules and apply the โ€œarmโ€™s length principleโ€, provided that this principle is embedded in national tax law. However, it found that the EU Commission did not show that Apple had been granted a selective advantage, essentially criticizing the EU Commissionโ€™s assessment of the tax rulings under the applicable Irish tax law. The General Court therefore annulled the decision.

In ๐ญ๐จ๐๐š๐ฒโ€™s judgment, the European Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court. In summary, it rules that the General Court erroneously found that the EU Commissionโ€™s assessment was not sufficient to demonstrate that the tax rulings constituted a selective advantage. The Court also gives final judgment on the matter itself, rather than referring the case back to the General Court, and confirms the initial decision of the EU Commission.

This means that Ireland will now have to recover the tax benefits granted to Apple, amounting to approximately โ‚ฌ13 billion.

๐Œ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ?
Read the judgement ๐Ÿ–นย 

๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ? ๐Ÿ‘‰ Feel free to contact your usual contact person at ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ.

#CJEU #GeneralCourt #Apple #Ireland #EuropeanCommission #Stateaid #TaxRulings #contrastupdate


Related insights

View all insights

In for more insights?

Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ€“ without any heavy legal jargon. โ€˜In the Pictureโ€™ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.

One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.

Sign up
close

Log into your account

close

Forgot password?

Request a new password by providing your email address.

close

Password reset

Enter your new password.

close

Password registration

close

Activate your account

Activate your account by providing your email address.

close

Thanks

You will receive an email with a link to enter a new password.

Close
close

Thanks

Your new password is successfully saved.

Close