๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐: ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐
๐๐
๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ? โ๏ธโฝ
As reported earlier (see our LinkedIn post: https://lnkd.in/eHq_YTy8), in a preliminary ruling of 4 October 2024 the EU Court of Justice found that certain FIFA transfer rules are contrary to the free movement of workers and competition law.
Following the preliminary ruling, FIFA has issued a press release indicating that it will open a โglobal dialogue on the transfer systemโ in light of the required changes to its transfer rules.
In his contribution in the Juristenkrant of 23 October 2024, our senior associate Benjamin Magnus discusses the ECJ judgement. He explains why and how the ECJ decided that the FIFA transfer rules are contrary to EU law and considers the possible consequences of the judgement, which may be far-reaching.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ?
๐ You can access the article here (in Dutch): https://lnkd.in/ebSTd5kG.
๐ You can read the ECJ judgement here: https://lnkd.in/ePRDcvAP.
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ? Feel free to contact Benjamin or your usual contact person at ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
#sports #football #competitionlaw #sportslaw #disputeresolution #ECJ #FIFA #RBFA #contrastpublications
Related insights
View all insightsIn for more insights?
Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ without any heavy legal jargon. โIn the Pictureโ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.
One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.