๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐
๐๐
๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฐ โฝ๏ธ
Following a request for a preliminary ruling, the ECJ has issued a judgment which will likely have far-reaching consequences for the professional football market.
The case concerns a former professional footballer who challenged a number of FIFA rules before Belgian courts, arguing that these prevented his employment by a Belgian football club. The rules in question concern the situation where a club considers that one of its players has terminated his employment contract before the normal term of that contract without โjust causeโ. In such a situation, the FIFA rules state that the player and new club are jointly and severally liable to compensate the former club. The new club may also be banned from registering new players for a certain period of time. Lastly, the national association of the playerโs former club must refuse to authorise any transfer as long as the dispute between the player and his former club is pending.
The ECJ ruled that these rules were contrary to the free movement of workers and competition law:
1. The rules impede the free movement of professional footballers wishing to work for a new club. Although restrictions on the free movement of footballers may be justified by overriding reasons in the public interest consisting in ensuring the regularity of interclub football competitions, by maintaining a certain degree of stability in the player rosters of professional football clubs, the rules in question seem to go beyond that objective.
2. The rules have as their object the restriction, and even prevention of cross-border competition between clubs established in the EU. The ECJ remarks that recruiting trained players is a key factor of competition in the professional football sector, and rules that place a restriction on that form of competition are similar to no-poach cartels. The ECJ further remarks that those rules do not appear indispensable or necessary.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ?
Today's decision marks another major setback for footballโs regulatory bodies, which were already weakened by the trio of sports antitrust rulings of last December (concerning the European Super League, the ISU and the Royal Antwerp Football Club). While this case is not officially concluded, as the referring court still needs to issue a ruling based on the ECJโs guidance, it seems unlikely that the transfer system will remain unchanged. Footballโs regulatory bodies shall urgently need to seek alternative routes to organise the professional football transfer system.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ ?
๐ Read the judgment: https://lnkd.in/e6r2GddV
#Sports #Football #FIFA #ECJ #competitionlaw #sportslaw #EUlaw #contrastupdate
Related insights
View all insightsIn for more insights?
Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ without any heavy legal jargon. โIn the Pictureโ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.
One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.