Newschevron_rightcontrast publication on procedural indemnity
contrast publication on procedural indemnity
๐๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ: ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐โ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ โ๏ธ๐๏ธ
Can a Belgian judge ๐ฆ๐น ๐ฐ๐ง๐ง๐ช๐ค๐ช๐ฐ decide to award the correct procedural indemnity (โ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฉ๐ต๐ด๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ด๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จโ) when the parties have made a mistake, or must the judge always adhere to the amounts claimed by the parties? And what happens when parties forget to claim a procedural indemnity?
Our senior associate Benjamin Magnus answers these questions in his contribution in the Juristenkrant of 11 September 2024, in which he discusses several relevant judgments of the Belgian Court of Cassation.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ? As a subscriber to Jura, you can access the article here (in Dutch).
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ? Feel free to contact Benjamin or your usual contact person at ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
#litigation #disputeresolution #legalcosts #proceduralindemnity #rechtsplegingsvergoeding #justitie #contrastpublications
Related insights
View all insights
In for more insights?
Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ without any heavy legal jargon. โIn the Pictureโ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.
One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.
