Newschevron_rightECJ judgment in RFC Seraing case: why parties can't eโฆ
ECJ judgment in RFC Seraing case: why parties can't escape EU law via arbitration
As reported earlier (see our LinkedIn post: https://lnkd.in/eCe-BHqR), in a preliminary ruling of 1 August 2025, the EU Court of Justice ruled that arbitral awards, such as those issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), cannot automatically be considered binding in EU Member States when EU public policy is at stake.
In their recent contribution in De Juristenkrant of 24 september 2025, our dispute resolution counsel Benjamin Magnus and associate Marie-Julie Kormoss discuss the ECJ judgment. They explore the broader implications for (sports) arbitration and explain how the judgment confirms the role of national courts as gatekeepers of fair dispute resolution.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ?
๐ Read the full article (in Dutch) below or on our website: https://lnkd.in/ewMKMjgZ
๐ You can read the ECJ judgment here: https://lnkd.in/eEHgzA-i
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ? Feel free to contact Benjamin, Marie-Julie, or your usual contact person at ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
#ECJ #DisputeResolution #Arbitration #SportsLaw #CAS #CompetitionLaw #contrastpublications
Related insights
View all insightsIn for more insights?
Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ without any heavy legal jargon. โIn the Pictureโ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.
One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.