“The court considers the combination of the limitation in duration and territory to be unlawful […] Consequently, the court reduces article 1 of the non-competition agreement to three years after the signing of the non-competition agreement, within the Benelux, France, and England.”

The judgement of the 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐭 of 5 February 2018 offers an interesting and comprehensive application of the principles established through the (landmark) rulings of the Court of Cassation of the past decade. The non-competition obligation in question had a duration of 5 years and a territorial scope covering the entire European Union. Considering the concrete activities of the target company and their geographical scope, the court found the non-competition obligation to be excessive and decided to limit the duration and the geographical scope thereof, in line with the jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation.

👉 Want to learn more about this judgement and other key Belgian M&A cases from 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟐𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬? You can find them all here, together with our related annotations.

📊By the way, did you know that 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟓𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌&𝐀 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐲 (https://lnkd.in/efJUPcN7) shows that more than 80% of the examined acquisition agreements contained a non-competition covenant, and that the duration of the non-competition clause is typically three years? We will be organizing a 𝟔𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌&𝐀 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐲 this year. Leave your contact details on this form to participate and help us find out whether this trend has continued.

Follow along with our corporate and M&A team as we highlight more interesting case law in the coming weeks!

𝐀𝐧𝐲 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬? Please contact the authors (Bart Bellen | Ine Schockaert | Kristof De Wael | Karlien De Ryck | Maarten Cnudde | Charlotte Van Weehaeghe | Ward De Byser | Marthe Wouters).

#MergersandAcquisitions #Kroniek #Chronicle #Survey #mandasurvey #sharepurchaseagreements #CaseLaw #noncompete