Newschevron_rightNo-poach agreements are not automatically 'by object'โ€ฆ


No-poach agreements are not automatically 'by object' restriction of competition

4 mei 2026
Studentcorner Event

In its preliminary ruling of 30 April 2026 in the ๐‚๐ƒ ๐“๐จ๐ง๐๐ž๐ฅ๐š ๐œ๐š๐ฌ๐ž, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) reiterated that a by object qualification is never automatic or presumed. It must be interpreted strictly and assessed on the basis of (i) the content of the agreement, decision or practice, (ii) the economic and legal context and (iii) the objectives pursued.

The case concerned a temporary no-poach commitment between Portuguese professional football clubs in 2020. While the ECJ acknowledged that such an arrangement constitutes a manifest restriction of a key competitive parameter, namely the recruitment of players, and may also have an indirect impact on remuneration, it also made one thing very clear: ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐จ๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ.

Here, the COVID-19 context and the objective of ensuring a fair conclusion of the suspended competition are emphasised by the ECJ. The suspension of the ongoing competition created a risk that clubs would lose end of contract players before the season could be completed to the detriment of fair competition. The ECJ therefore gave strong guidance to the referring Portuguese court arguing against a by object qualification in the present circumstances.

In case of a by effect qualification, the ECJ reiterated that the pursuit of legitimate objectives may, in certain circumstances, outweigh restrictive effects.

The judgment also contains an important reminder on the broad understanding of what may constitute a decision of an association of undertakings. Although the no-poach concerned an agreement between clubs, the presence of the associationโ€™s president in the public announcement was sufficient for that characterisation.

๐Œ๐š๐ข๐ง ๐ค๐ž๐ฒ ๐ญ๐š๐ค๐ž๐š๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ:

1. No-poach agreements remain high-risk.
2. By object infringements are never automatic or presumed.
3. Associations should be careful: even a small role may have large consequences.

๐Ÿ’ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ? Feel free to reach out to our competition team or your usual contact person at ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ.

#EUlaw #CJEU #ECJ #competitionlaw #sportslaw #Tondela #contrastupdate


Related insights

View all insights

In for more insights?

Why sign up for our newsletter? Because we keep things clear โ€“ without any heavy legal jargon. โ€˜In the Pictureโ€™ delivers concise updates on legal developments and practical insights that you can actually use.

One newsletter per month, in English, French and Dutch.

Sign up
close

Log into your account

close

Forgot password?

Request a new password by providing your email address.

close

Password reset

Enter your new password.

close

Password registration

close

Activate your account

Activate your account by providing your email address.

close

Thanks

You will receive an email with a link to enter a new password.

Close
close

Thanks

Your new password is successfully saved.

Close